MacBook Pro 2016 Review: Is it Apple's Almost-perfect Laptop?

Posted by Unknown on Sunday, November 27, 2016



Apple has been remarkably consistent in two areas over the years. Firstly, it has invented new technologies and ways of using its products that wow its users. And secondly, it has often exasperated vocal sections of its user base by ditching tried-and-tested standards, from the CD drive to the headphone jack.The new MacBook Pro follows tradition in this regard.

As the first significant update to Apple’s range of high-end laptops in four years, it packs in a host of upgrades, including a thinner design, higher-quality screen, new trackpad and keyboard, as well as a power boost. It also has two things never seen on a laptop – a touchscreen strip above the keyboard known as the “Touch Bar” and the Touch ID fingerprint scanner that iPhone and iPad users will recognise.

But true to form, it has also been controversial. It is not as powerful as many users would like, it can’t be upgraded, and there is no traditional USB port or SD card slot (the only ports included on the new MacBooks are the USB-C standard). This has irritated many creative types, including musicians and video editors, whom Apple has always championed, and means most people using the new MacBook Pro will need to invest in additional dongles or wires.

This is not to mention the price, which starts at £1,449, goes to £1,749 for the Touch Bar version and rises to £2,699 for the most expensive model: a stretch even by Apple’s standards.

Design and display

There are three main models of the new MacBook Pro: a 13-inch model without the Touch Bar or Touch ID, and 13-inch and 15-inch versions that do have them. In place of the Touch Bar, the entry-level model has the familiar row of function keys atop the keyboard, as well as two USB-C ports instead of four, and a less powerful processor.

At a glance | MacBook Pro

Key things to know
Sizes:Available in 13-inch or 15-inch. They are “the thinnest ever MacBook”, around 20 per cent smaller in volume than previous models
Best new features:Touch Bar, TouchID and USB-C ports
Battery life:up to 10 hours
Colours:silver and space grey
RAM:8GB - 16GB
Cost:starts from £1,499 for the 13-inch MacBook Pro
Key dates:Out now

Touch Bar
Touch Bar is a screen that replaces the function keys at the top of the keyboard. The buttons on the new strip change depending on what program you're using at any given time.

For example, when you’re in Safari it will display shortcuts to your favourite websites. It can also be used to adjust brightness and change the volume of a song, as well as straighten a picture in Photos or suggest words while you’re typing.

USB-C
Instead of a standard USB port, the MacBook Pro has four USB-C ports. All four sockets can be used to charge the laptop or attach USB-C, Thunderbolt, HDMI and USB connectors. You’ll need an adapter of course, but these can be purchased for less than £20 online.

All three models are thinner and lighter than their predecessors, although at 1.4kg for the 13-inch version, they are not quite ultraportable.

The screen, though, is gorgeous: even at two-thirds brightness it looks fantastic. The laptop comes in the traditional silver as well as space grey, and as you'd expect, look and feel great.

Keyboard and Trackpad

For all the excitement about the Touch Bar, it would be worth nothing if the new MacBook Pro didn’t have a decent keyboard and trackpad. Luckily, both are fantastic.

The keyboard borrows the “butterfly” design from last year’s 12-inch MacBook: the keys are fairly shallow and don’t travel very far, but it is a joy to type on and I took to it instantly.



The computer’s compact form means the up and down arrow keys are a little small, and while the keyboard is a little louder than you might be used to, neither are huge issues.

The glass trackpad has always been one of the MacBook’s biggest advantages over Windows laptops, none of which come close to matching it, and this is as true as ever on the new MacBook. The trackpad is enormous, making it easy to scroll from one side of the screen to the other and make multi-finger gestures. It also has special thumb-detection technology that stops it from responding when you rest your hands on it while typing.

The trackpad has the same “Force Touch” technology as last year’s 12-inch MacBook and last year's MacBook Pro, so you click it to select and click harder for a different action – preview a web page in Safari or drag a section of text in Microsoft Word. For newbies, it’s a similar effect to the iPhone’s 3D Touch, and is very useful once you master it.

Ultimately, the fundamentals of a good laptop – screen, keyboard and trackpad – are all executed flawlessly, but at this point we expect that from Apple. What’s more interesting is what’s new, which brings us to.

The Touch Bar

The main selling point of the new MacBook Pro is the Touch Bar, which is a thin LCD touchscreen above the keyboard where the escape key and function keys usually are.

While physical buttons are static, the Touch Bar is infinitely flexible and customisable – the idea is that whatever you are doing, it will give you a useful set of controls. When typing, it can suggest your next word; in iMessage it will show you a strip of emojis; when watching a video it displays a slider you can move back and forth to pick a point in the video; open a new tab in Safari and it will show your favourite websites.


The traditional controls for volume, screen brightness and music haven’t gone away; they’re just collapsed into a section on the right side of the Touch Bar, which you can expand by toggling a button on the side.

While the Touch Bar is easy to use, I haven’t found it that useful and the kindest way to describe it is a work in progress.

Although it is open for developers to use, because it’s brand new, few non-Apple programs support the Touch Bar at present. If you spend all day in Chrome or Microsoft Excel, nothing happens (although Microsoft Office is coming soon).

As for those programs that do support it, such as Safari and iMessage, in testing I’ve found myself using it for the sake of using it, not because it is genuinely useful. A lot of its functions – switching tabs in Safari, for example – are more quickly accomplished using keyboard shortcuts, which are now part of my muscle memory. And, truth be told, some of the Touch Bar’s functions are just not that practical. Take word suggestions – while they can be useful on the iPhone’s virtual keyboard, when you have a full set of QWERTY keys in front of you it’s simply quicker to type than to take your fingers off the keyboard to tap at the Touch Bar.


The other thing about the Touch Bar is it requires you to look away from the screen. If you’re confident enough in your typing to not have to do that, it’s unfamiliar to be constantly looking down.

These criticisms, however, are of the Touch Bar experience today. Support from other programs is bound to get better, and one day using it might be as natural as clacking away on a keyboard. One feature that is fantastic is the strip of emojis you can select in iMessage.

Touch ID

Touch ID has been one of the great unsung Apple inventions of recent years. We now have secure iPhones that unlock just by pressing the home button. The range of uses has also expanded to Apple Pay, logging into apps and confirming security changes.

We’ve had it for a while, so its addition to the MacBook might not be as exciting as the Touch Bar, but it is definitely useful.


The sensor, located in the power button at the top right of the keyboard can be used to unlock your computer when it’s asleep, confirm the purchase of apps, and shop on the web using Apple Pay. One app that I use a lot is 1Password, which manages all your different logins, and being able to open it just with a tap is so much more convenient.

If you have multiple users on a machine, Touch ID will recognise each user’s individual fingerprint and log them into their account.

At a glance | What is Apple's Touch ID?

Touch ID is Apple's fingerprint identity technology. Device owners can use it to unlock a device without typing in a passcode or to authenticate paying for items.
How does it work?

Touch ID crams in a range of integrated technologies to deliver swift, biometric recognition.

Formed from a steel capacitive ring, sapphire lens, image sensor and secure enclave, Touch ID relies on a range of components working in harmony – all to provide a simple, effortless authentication process. Not just for show, the silver ring around each Touch ID is actually a capacitive sensor. Designed to detect when your finger is present, the silver ring sparks the rest of the Touch ID assembly to life, and saves precious battery life by ensuring it isn’t always on.

Touch ID operates like a traditional flatbed scanner you’d use for scanning photographs. Protected by a layer of durable, Sapphire glass, the image of the fingerprint is focused directly onto the Touch ID sensor.

After this detailed scan, a high definition image is then taken and temporarily stored in a secure enclave for analysis. Measuring features of your fingerprint such as sub dermal ridge flow angles, this process identifies the fundamental aspects that make your fingerprint unique and produces a unique key. Enough information to accurately identify your finger again, the data stored by Touch ID is nowhere near enough to reconstruct your original fingerprint. Once your unique fingerprint data has been collected, only mathematical representation of the scan remains, stored and encrypted without your identity on your iDevice - and never used anywhere else.

So how does it recognise me?

Every time you unlock your phone, the scanning process is repeated and your fingerprint is once again analysed. If the data key generated matches the one already stored on your iDevice, the handset is unlocked.


There’s still a lot of potential for biometric security – logging into online accounts instead of using passwords, for example – so it’s great to see it come to the computer. I’d even go so far as to say I’ve found Touch ID more useful than the Touch Bar itself in testing.

Ports (or lack thereof)

The most controversial features of the new MacBook Pro are those that aren’t there: There’s no SD card slot, no traditional USB port, and no Thunderbolt 2. Instead, there are four Thunderbolt 3 USB-C connections (or two on the version without the Touch Bar), which are used both for power and external connections.

At a glance | What is USB-C?


USB-C is an evolution of the USB port. The USB-C cable has the same plug on both ends and is noticeably smaller than the older version, with rounded edges. You can connect it interchangeably and don't need to worry about whether the cable is upside down.

The new technology has a top speed of 10Gbps and power output of up to 100 watts, meaning the MacBook Pro, which requires around 60 to 85 watts of power, could be charged through the port. As the cable works in two directions, it means that devices plugged into the laptop could also be used to charge it.

Will I need an adapter?

If you have a current Android handset it is likely that you won't need an adapter in order to attach your phone to the new computers.

However, Apple is yet to introduce USB-C to its own phones. Although it may be the first computer manufacturer to introduce USB-C, the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus still use a Lightning Port and standard USB. If Apple doesn't release its own adapter, owners that want to continue using their older devices will need to invest in one


USB-C is a great technology – it’s fast, reversible and compact, and can be used for everything from video output to data transfers to charging – and is set to become the standard over the coming years. But right now, we are in a transition: even the iPhone cable uses the older USB format, and many photographers store their photos on SD cards.

This means to make the MacBook Pro compatible with all your current gadgets you will need to buy an array of extra wires and dongles, none of which come in the box. Apple has cut the price of its peripherals in response to an outcry, but it would have been nice to at least get a USB-C to USB-A adapter included.


All that said, the world is moving towards the universal USB-C format, and Apple’s move to ditch every other port will only speed this up. Many people buy a laptop for the next five years, not for now, and just as we’ve coped to live without DVD drives or Ethernet cables, I’ll bet that we’ll forget about this too.

The trusty headphone jack remains, despite Apple removing it from the iPhone 7 this year.

Performance and battery life

For the money that you’ll spend on one of these laptops, you’d expect top of the range performance, and while there have been a few quibbles about using the previous generation of Intel processor, the new MacBook Pros are certainly an upgrade on previous models.

I don’t do a lot of video or photo editing that requires a lot of graphical muscle, so all I can say is that everything I have thrown at the MacBook Pro it has handled with aplomb. Apple is also claiming a big leap in gaming performance, although as ever, if you’re looking for a pure gaming laptop you should look elsewhere.

Specs do increase along the pricing curve – the model with the Touch Bar has a faster processor while the 15-inch version packs in dedicated graphics and more RAM – which is worth bearing in mind even if you’re not convinced by the Touch Bar itself.

On battery life, Apple promises 10 hours for day-to-day use such as browsing the web or watching video, and in my tests it certainly lived up to that.

Verdict

The MacBook Pro is a step forward in many ways: a great keyboard, trackpad, screen and a boost to performance all make this a laptop that is a delight for everyday use.

Touch ID is also a great addition and instantly improved how I used the laptop on a day-to-day basis. But I was less impressed with the Touch Bar: while it’s a fun piece of tech, I didn’t find myself wanting to use it that often, and at times I missed the old function keys.

This could well change as time goes on and more apps begin to support the Touch Bar, so I’m interested to see how it evolves. For those who don’t think it’s necessary, the cheapest MacBook Pro doesn’t have the Touch Bar, and at a £300 discount, it’s tempting to say that represents better value - although you also lose Touch ID and two USB-C ports at this price point.

It’s also difficult to ignore the price: this is an expensive machine in a world of very capable cheaper laptops that do have standard USB ports and SD card slots (the pound’s fall post-Brexit hasn’t helped here). But if you’re willing to stretch to it and can handle living in a world of peripherals, the MacBook Pro is still the one laptop I would choose: just not for the reasons you might think.

Pros: Great keyboard, beautiful screen, Touch ID

Cons: Touch Bar not that useful yet, price, having to use USB-C adapters

Read More

How Technology is Helping Catch Nighttime Poachers in Africa

Posted by Unknown



The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is harnessing sophisticated technology to catch nighttime poachers in Eastern Africa.

Since the deployment of thermal imaging cameras and human detection software nine months ago, more than two dozen poachers have been arrested in Kenya’s Maasai Mara, the wildlife conservation organization announced this week. The technology has also been used to catch two other poachers at another undisclosed national park in Kenya.

In March the WWF, working with the Mara Conservancy ranger unit and the Kenya Wildlife Service, installed technology from thermal imaging specialist FLIR Systems on a mobile wildlife ranger unit. The technology was also installed, with additional human detection software, in another Kenyan park.

“Wildlife rangers now have the help they’ve desperately needed,” said Colby Loucks, WWF’s Wildlife Crime Technology Project lead, in a press release. “This groundbreaking technology allows them to search for poachers 24 hours a day, from up to a mile away, in pitch darkness.”

Poaching poses a massive threat to African wildlife. Rhino poaching, for example, has hit a record level across the continent, and the number of savannah elephants is declining rapidly as a result of the ivory trade.

“This technology is invaluable in our night surveillance work. The ability of our rangers to distinguish potential poachers from a large distance is nothing short of remarkable,” said Brian Heath, CEO and Director of the Mara Conservancy, in the press release. “The last three people our team arrested were flabbergasted as to how they were detected.”

WWF and FLIR Systems are looking to broaden the use of thermal imaging and are working with African Parks, drone specialist UDS and Lindbergh Foundation’s Air Shepherd to install thermal imaging technology on drones. Anti-poaching drone test flights began last month in Malawi and Zimbabwe.

WWF told FoxNews.com that it plans to use the technology in 20 additional sites in Africa and Asia.

The Wildlife Crime Technology Project is supported by a $5 million grant from Google.
Read More

First Hyperloop Could Blaze a Trail Between Dubai and Abu Dhabi

Posted by Unknown


Hyperloop One, which aims to fulfill the vision of high-speed transportation promoted by Elon Musk, has signed a deal to develop a line between Dubai and UAE capital Abu Dhabi, Dubai reportedly announced this week.

No financial terms have been disclosed, but the project reportedly will have several stations throughout Dubai connecting the hyperloop system to Abu Dhabi.

Pods will carry passengers and cargo between the two.

Dubai's government-backed port operator, DP World, reportedly also has signed an agreement with Hyperloop One to look into using the technology at its industrial Jebel Ali port.

Dubai last month announced a competition inviting participants to present design plans for a hyperloop track between various airports.

Hyperloop Challenges

SpaceX, helmed by Musk, is building a mile-long test track for hyperloop pods in California.

Hyperloop One, which is constructing a test track in the Nevada desert, this spring demonstrated a mag-lev Hyperloop sled that ran for 100 yards or so.

Musk proposed the hyperloop concept as a way to bring high-speed travel to California. A hyperloop journey between Los Angeles and San Francisco would take about 30 minutes.

SpaceX also has a Hyperloop competition under way. An MIT team won the first round in February.

Why the Middle East?

Abu Dhabi and the Emirates "would be a good choice, because the Emirates are willing to spend exorbitant amounts of money on a project like this," said Jim McGregor, a principal analyst at Tirias Research.

"Doing this in the United States would be a political disaster, because the final cost is likely to be exponentially higher than the original optimistic estimates," he told TechNewsWorld.

Investment documents indicate Hyperloop One plans to raise up to US$250 million in its next funding round early next year; it reportedly raised $50 million last month.

The cost of the Hyperloop One projects could exceed Musk's original projections substantially, based on internal estimates in company documents, but Hyperloop One has forecast huge profits for itself and its partners.

When Musk floated the hyperloop concept in 2013, he estimated that a route between Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area would cost about $6 billion.

That figure raised doubts from the get-go. Among those opposed to Musk's concept and critical of his estimates are proponents of a $68 billion high-speed rail project that has been years in the making.

Other Problems for Hyperloop

Regulatory and other issues also could have driven the hyperloop project abroad.

"Here in the United States, a project has to be competitive with other forms of transportation -- and there many alternatives," observed Michael Jude, a program manager at Stratecast/Frost & Sullivan.

U.S. regulators haven't a clue how to deal with the hyperloop, he told TechNewsWorld.

Further, safety is an issue, because "you've got this thing going at marginal supersonic speeds 20 feet above ground, and if a truck or something ran into one of the supports and damaged or knocked down a tube, you've got a ballistic missile," Jude said. "The liability is going to be unthinkable."

Such projects must be cost-justified in the U.S., which might be difficult, he suggested, and there is also the specter of terrorism.

There are no markets outside the U.S. that would support a hyperloop, Jude maintained.

"This is a solution looking for a problem," he said. It's hideously expensive, and it's a great terrorist target."
Read More

Meet PoisonTap, the $5 tool that ransacks password-protected computers

Posted by Unknown



Proving once again that you can do a lot of damage with a little investment and a lot of ingenuity, security researcher Samy Kamkar recently managed to take down a locked, password-protected computer armed with only a US$5 Raspberry Pi.

The low-tech cookie-siphoning intrusion is one of Kamkar's simplest hacks ever. He previously has unlocked car doors, garages, wireless remote cameras and other devices, with MacGyver-like precision.

Kamkar's latest hack, PoisonTap, uses a Raspberry Pi Zero, a micro SD card, and a micro USB cable or other device that emulates USB, including USB Armory or LAN Turtle.

Windows, OS X and Linux recognize PoisonTap as an Ethernet device, load it as a low-priority network device, and perform a DHCP request across it, even if the computer is locked or password-protected, Kamkar explained.

PoisonTap provides the computer with an IP address. However, the DHCP response tells the machine that the IPv4 space is part of PoisonTap's local network, rather than a small subnet, he said.

If a Web browser is running in the background, one of the open pages will perform an HTTP request in the background, noted Kamkar. PoisonTap responds with a spoof, returning its own address, and the HTTP request hits the PoisonTap Web server.

When the node Web server gets the request, PoisonTap's response is interpreted as HTML or JavaScript.

The attacker is able to hijack all Internet traffic from the machine and siphon and store HTTP cookies from the Web browser or the top 1,000,000 Alexa websites.
Low-Cost Havoc

"The PoisonTap project is an extremely clever and creative attack that can have serious consequences," said Mark Nunnikhoven, vice president for cloud research at Trend Micro.

"The code is public, and hardware required to run it is only a few dollars, which increases the risk to average users," he told TechNewsWorld. "However, it still takes some effort for an attacker to steal the user's data."

For the device to work, the attacker needs physical access to the machine while a Web browser is running in the background, noted a Symantec researcher in comments provided to TechNewsWorld by spokesperson Jenn Foss.

The risk is lower when a machine has restricted physical access. The risk is higher when a machine is in the public domain, where anyone potentially has access to it -- for example, at a sidewalk cafe.

Open Source Factor

It might be easier to build a solution to the hack, given that Kamkar's attack was conducted over an open source language, suggested the Symantec researcher. "If someone slips a secret backdoor into an open source project, chances are someone will find it quickly. Often open source is quicker to address vulnerabilities as an open source community can be very large."

In addition, if someone creates a tool and the source code is publicly available, anyone can read the code and develop proper protection for the future, the Symantec researcher pointed out.

"It's certainly very creative work, and it shows just how many attack vectors exist that we've yet to really consider," remarked Troy Hunt, Microsoft MVP-Developer Security.

"However, it also requires physical access -- and once you get to that point, there's a lot of avenues available to an attacker," he told TechNewsWorld.

The use of HTTPS could have crippled this particular attack, Hunt noted, and we don't normally think of that as being a defense against an adversary with physical access.
Read More